Myrmecologicalnews.org

  • Journal home
  • About – Aims and scope
  • About – Open access
  • Editorial information
  • Publisher
  • Author instructions
  • Submission
  • Current and past volumes (PDFs)
    • Current Volume
    • Volume 35 (2025)
    • Volume 34 (2024)
    • Volume 33 (2023)
    • Volume 32 (2022)
    • Volume 31 (2021)
    • Volume 30 (2020)
    • Volume 29 (2019)
    • Volume 28 (2018)
    • Volume 27 (2018)
    • Volume 26 (2018)
    • Volume 25 (2017)
    • Volume 24 (2017)
    • Volume 23 (2016)
    • Volume 22 (2016)
    • Volume 21 (2015)
    • Volume 20 (2014)
    • Volume 19 (2014)
    • Volume 18 (2013)
    • Volume 17 (2012)
    • Volume 16 (2012)
    • Volume 15 (2011)
    • Volume 14 (2011)
    • Volume 13 (2010)
    • Volume 12 (2009)
    • Volume 11 (2008)
    • Volume 10 (2007)
    • Volume 9 (2006)
    • Volume 8 (2006)
    • Volume 7 (2005)
    • Volume 6 (2004)
    • Volume 5 (2003)
    • Volume 4 (2001)
    • Volume 3 (1999)
    • Volume 2 (1998)
    • Volume 1 (1995)
  • Buy print version (Vol. 1 - 27)
  • Contact us
  • In the media
  • Imprint
  • Sign up to Newsletter
  • Visit our Blog
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Mastodon
  1. Journal Home
  2. Current and past volumes (PDFs)
  3. Volume 7 (2005)
  4. Myrmecologische Nachrichten 7: 91-94

Myrmecologische Nachrichten 7: 91-94; printable

 

Download PDF file (217KB)

Export citation in TXT format

Export citation in RIS format

  • Interested in receiving weekly updates on Myrmecol. News & Myrmecol. News Blog? Sign up to Newsletter.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_007:091
  • Open Access: CC BY 4.0
  • Author: Floren, A.
  • Year: 2005
  • Title: How reliable are data on arboreal ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) communities collected by insecticidal fogging?
  • Journal: Myrmecological News
  • Volume: 7
  • Pages: 91-94
  • Type of contribution: Original Article
  • Supplementary material: No
  • Abstract: Insecticidal fogging has proven to be an efficient method for sampling arboreal arthropods in tropical lowland rain forests. By exact positioning of the collecting funnels beneath the tree and by excluding arthropods from higher canopy levels, fogging can be a precise tool to collect for example ant communities in a tree-species specific way. Such clearly defined communities form a good model system for community analysis. Analysis, however, requires knowledge about how representative communities were sampled from the trees. In order to assess this, ant nests were located in the trees the day before fogging. For that purpose ants were attracted to bait (pieces of tuna and sugar-water) placed on all branches in the trees. Pursuing the ants from the baits made it easy to localize the ants' nests in the trees and to get information on the relative size of the colonies. Comparing these results with those obtained by fogging showed that fogging does not always describe abundance hierarchies correctly and that different species could be numerically dominant at the bait compared to the fogging samples. Particularly, abundances of stem-nesting species are underestimated indicating the necessity to correct ant abundances for a specific community-level analysis. Open access, licensed under CC BY 4.0. © 2005 The Author(s).
  • Key words: Core communities, ant nest localization, fogging efficiency.
  • Publisher: The Austrian Society of Entomofaunistics
  • ISSN: Print: 1994-4136 - Online: 1997-3500

© 2026 Myrmecologicalnews.org

To Top