Myrmecologicalnews.org

  • Journal home
  • About – Aims and scope
  • About – Open access
  • Editorial information
  • Publisher
  • Author instructions
  • Submission
  • Current and past volumes (PDFs)
    • Current Volume
    • Volume 35 (2025)
    • Volume 34 (2024)
    • Volume 33 (2023)
    • Volume 32 (2022)
    • Volume 31 (2021)
    • Volume 30 (2020)
    • Volume 29 (2019)
    • Volume 28 (2018)
    • Volume 27 (2018)
    • Volume 26 (2018)
    • Volume 25 (2017)
    • Volume 24 (2017)
    • Volume 23 (2016)
    • Volume 22 (2016)
    • Volume 21 (2015)
    • Volume 20 (2014)
    • Volume 19 (2014)
    • Volume 18 (2013)
    • Volume 17 (2012)
    • Volume 16 (2012)
    • Volume 15 (2011)
    • Volume 14 (2011)
    • Volume 13 (2010)
    • Volume 12 (2009)
    • Volume 11 (2008)
    • Volume 10 (2007)
    • Volume 9 (2006)
    • Volume 8 (2006)
    • Volume 7 (2005)
    • Volume 6 (2004)
    • Volume 5 (2003)
    • Volume 4 (2001)
    • Volume 3 (1999)
    • Volume 2 (1998)
    • Volume 1 (1995)
  • Buy print version (Vol. 1 - 27)
  • Contact us
  • In the media
  • Imprint
  • Sign up to Newsletter
  • Visit our Blog
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Mastodon
  1. Journal Home
  2. Current and past volumes (PDFs)
  3. Volume 23 (2016)
  4. Myrmecol. News 23: 101-118

Myrmecol. News 23: 101-118

Download PDF file (1,638KB)

Export citation in TXT format

Export citation in RIS format

  • Interested in receiving weekly updates on Myrmecol. News & Myrmecol. News Blog? Sign up to Newsletter.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_023:101
  • Open Access: CC BY 3.0
  • Author: Adams, E.S.
  • Year: 2016
  • Title: Territoriality in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a review
  • Journal: Myrmecological News
  • Volume: 23
  • Pages: 101-118
  • Type of contribution: Review Article
  • Supplementary material: -
  • Abstract: Territory defense by ants is a social process with strong ecological effects. I review the mechanisms by which ants partition space, the behaviors governing individual and colony territorial responses, and the effects of territory defense on populations and communities. Partitioning of space is sometimes accomplished by massive battles, but well defined boundaries are also maintained by less violent means, including avoidance of competitors. Ants flexibly adjust individual and group territorial behavior according to location, scent marks, prior experience, and the local density of nestmates and competitors. An ongoing theoretical challenge is to incorporate these processes into models that accurately predict division of space. Many studies have documented strong effects of territorial interactions on the growth, movement, survival, reproduction, and spacing of competing colonies. Far fewer studies have measured the net effect of territoriality on population dynamics. Fighting can be costly, but there is little evidence that it appreciably reduces worker density or that loss of territoriality promotes the invasiveness of exotic ants. Territorial ants are said to be at the top of competitive hierarchies that structure ant communities. Because much of the evidence is based on correlations, some claims about the community effects of territoriality have met with skepticism. Nonetheless, there is strong evidence from diverse habitats that territory defense produces multi-species mosaics of exclusive foraging areas and that territorial dominants influence the occurrence of some other ant species.
  • Key words: Aggression, ant mosaic, community structure, dear enemy, invasive ants, Lanchester's square law, review, spatial pattern, territory.
  • Publisher: The Austrian Society of Entomofaunistics
  • ISSN: Print: 1994-4136 - Online: 1997-3500

© 2026 Myrmecologicalnews.org

To Top