Myrmecologicalnews.org

  • Journal home
  • About – Aims and scope
  • About – Open access
  • Editorial information
  • Publisher
  • Author instructions
  • Submission
  • Current and past volumes (PDFs)
    • Current Volume
    • Volume 35 (2025)
    • Volume 34 (2024)
    • Volume 33 (2023)
    • Volume 32 (2022)
    • Volume 31 (2021)
    • Volume 30 (2020)
    • Volume 29 (2019)
    • Volume 28 (2018)
    • Volume 27 (2018)
    • Volume 26 (2018)
    • Volume 25 (2017)
    • Volume 24 (2017)
    • Volume 23 (2016)
    • Volume 22 (2016)
    • Volume 21 (2015)
    • Volume 20 (2014)
    • Volume 19 (2014)
    • Volume 18 (2013)
    • Volume 17 (2012)
    • Volume 16 (2012)
    • Volume 15 (2011)
    • Volume 14 (2011)
    • Volume 13 (2010)
    • Volume 12 (2009)
    • Volume 11 (2008)
    • Volume 10 (2007)
    • Volume 9 (2006)
    • Volume 8 (2006)
    • Volume 7 (2005)
    • Volume 6 (2004)
    • Volume 5 (2003)
    • Volume 4 (2001)
    • Volume 3 (1999)
    • Volume 2 (1998)
    • Volume 1 (1995)
  • Buy print version (Vol. 1 - 27)
  • Contact us
  • In the media
  • Imprint
  • Sign up to Newsletter
  • Visit our Blog
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Mastodon
  1. Journal Home
  2. Current and past volumes (PDFs)
  3. Volume 7 (2005)
  4. Myrmecologische Nachrichten 7: 17-24

Myrmecologische Nachrichten 7: 17-24; printable

 

Download PDF file (316KB)

Export citation in TXT format

Export citation in RIS format

  • Interested in receiving weekly updates on Myrmecol. News & Myrmecol. News Blog? Sign up to Newsletter.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_007:017
  • Open Access: CC BY 4.0
  • Author: Laeger, T. & Schultz, R.
  • Year: 2005
  • Title: Ameisen (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) als Beifänge in Bodenfallen – wie genau spiegeln sie reale Abundanzverhältnisse wider?
  • Journal: Myrmecological News
  • Volume: 7
  • Pages: 17-24
  • Type of contribution: Original Article
  • Supplementary material: No
  • Abstract: Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) as supplementary catches in pitfall traps – how exactly do they reflect real abundance? – In ecological investigations pitfall traps are often used to sample epigaeic arthropods. Ants are also caught, intentionally or otherwise and these ants are available for later evaluation. However, it is difficult to draw conclusions about the ant community because of the particular behaviour of the species at the traps. In this paper it was attempted to evaluate the true quantity of ants with the aid of a species-specific communication factor, which describes the catch probability for individual ant species. Beginning in 1995 pitfall traps were set up on dry grassland near Greifswald in Germany. The evaluation of the ant catches was carried out with the aid of the herewith introduced species-specific communication factor determined for the three species Formica rufa, F. fusca and Lasius niger. To investigate this, the behaviour of the ants at the pitfall traps was observed and recorded. The likelihood of better evaluation of the ant coenosis is discussed, through knowledge of the catch probability for single species. Open access, licensed under CC BY 4.0. © 2005 The Author(s).
  • Key words: Ants, Formicidae, behaviour, pitfall trap, diet, movement pattern.
  • Publisher: The Austrian Society of Entomofaunistics
  • ISSN: Print: 1994-4136 - Online: 1997-3500

© 2026 Myrmecologicalnews.org

To Top