This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. We do not use cookies for any promotional or marketing purpose. By clicking "I agree", you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device. You can reverse your decision any time by clicking "Remove cookies" in the left-hand menu. When using an Institutional subscription you must agree to cookies; otherwise, for technical reasons, we can't authorize you.
Abstract: In literature about the mandible dentation of IJo/yergus l'1!lescells incorrect formulations in the sense of "reduced" have .become common. lndeed the denticles have characteristics which should be seen as autapomorphics and play an essential role in piercing the enemy caput to destroy the central nervous system. In contraI)' the ,'ltrulIgylognathus which it is often compared to, is toothless but for a preapical denticle. It doesn't pierce the caput like P. rujescells as assumed in textbooks but penetrates with it's mandible through the mouth to the brain. The much strained convergence of both taxa is put into question.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. We do not use cookies for any promotional or marketing purpose. By clicking "I agree", you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device. You can reverse your decision any time by clicking "Remove cookies" in the left-hand menu. When using an Institutional subscription you must agree to cookies; otherwise, for technical reasons, we can't authorize you.