Myrmecologicalnews.org

  • Journal home
  • About – Aims and scope
  • About – Open access
  • Editorial information
  • Publisher
  • Author instructions
  • Submission
  • Current and past volumes (PDFs)
    • Current Volume
    • Volume 35 (2025)
    • Volume 34 (2024)
    • Volume 33 (2023)
    • Volume 32 (2022)
    • Volume 31 (2021)
    • Volume 30 (2020)
    • Volume 29 (2019)
    • Volume 28 (2018)
    • Volume 27 (2018)
    • Volume 26 (2018)
    • Volume 25 (2017)
    • Volume 24 (2017)
    • Volume 23 (2016)
    • Volume 22 (2016)
    • Volume 21 (2015)
    • Volume 20 (2014)
    • Volume 19 (2014)
    • Volume 18 (2013)
    • Volume 17 (2012)
    • Volume 16 (2012)
    • Volume 15 (2011)
    • Volume 14 (2011)
    • Volume 13 (2010)
    • Volume 12 (2009)
    • Volume 11 (2008)
    • Volume 10 (2007)
    • Volume 9 (2006)
    • Volume 8 (2006)
    • Volume 7 (2005)
    • Volume 6 (2004)
    • Volume 5 (2003)
    • Volume 4 (2001)
    • Volume 3 (1999)
    • Volume 2 (1998)
    • Volume 1 (1995)
  • Buy print version (Vol. 1 - 27)
  • Contact us
  • In the media
  • Imprint
  • Sign up to Newsletter
  • Visit our Blog
  • Follow us on Twitter
  • Follow us on Mastodon
  1. Journal Home
  2. Current and past volumes (PDFs)
  3. Volume 14 (2011)
  4. Myrmecol. News 14: 13-19

Myrmecol. News 14: 13-19; printable

Download PDF file (151KB)

Export citation in TXT format

Export citation in RIS format

  • Interested in receiving weekly updates on Myrmecol. News & Myrmecol. News Blog? Sign up to Newsletter.
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.25849/myrmecol.news_014:013
  • Open Access: CC BY 4.0
  • Author: Chen, Y.-Q., Li, Q., Wang, S.-M. & Zhou, X.-Y.
  • Year: 2011
  • Title: A comparison of pitfall traps with different liquids for studying ground-dwelling ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
  • Journal: Myrmecological News
  • Volume: 14
  • Pages: 13-19
  • Type of contribution: Original Article
  • Supplementary material: No
  • Abstract: The ability of different liquids in pitfall traps to provide a relatively unbiased representation of ant species foraging activity is poorly understood. We examined the effectiveness of a sugar / vinegar solution, commonly used in ant studies in China, by comparing its catches with those using ethylene glycol in lac agroecosystems in Yunnan Province, China. A total of 11052 individual ants were collected in the traps with sugar / vinegar mixture, representing 82 species, while 6102 individuals were captured in traps with ethylene glycol, representing 75 species. Individual-based curves as well as sample-based curves were so close that the two solutions showed no significant difference in species capture efficiency. Ordination analysis revealed that ant community composition was similar for captures by the two liquids. Liquid type had a significant effect on two of the six most abundant species, but this was confounded by traps with different liquids being placed in different transects. We conclude that the use of sugar / vinegar in traps provides a relatively unbiased representation of ant foraging activity, and is a valid option if other commonly used liquids are unavailable.
  • Key words: Capture effect, ethylene glycol, pitfall trapping, sugar / vinegar mixture, trap liquid.
  • Publisher: The Austrian Society of Entomofaunistics
  • ISSN: Print: 1994-4136 - Online: 1997-3500

© 2026 Myrmecologicalnews.org

To Top